In Memeriam: Safe For Work Porn

Related article.

The Internet is a vast open world full of everything, you know. I mean, you can find pretty much everything there, right ? Oh well, I think the correct word is “anything” though and not necessarily the prettiest things depending on where you stumble upon. That’s what makes it unique, in a way. So. what exactly can be found on the internet? Well… many things. Images of anything, mostly cats, videos of anything, mostly cats too even if, right now, it’s a weird naked Russian guy singing in front of a green screen that has taken the web’s attention. There are billions of websites with a plethora of purposes, some ot them sharing more or less legal stuff and there is the infamous Deep Web hiding behind seven proxies.
Wait! I’m sorry guys, I forgot about a very important item here. Porn of course!

Silly me, it really is a crucial component. the world wide web allowed its increasing development and a easier access to it. Online pornography isn’t something that new either. Let’s say that the main difference, at the time, was that it was way more difficult to have access to a great bunch of porn quickly in the early 2000s than nowadays.

 

Nostalgia…

 

Not everyone could get the willpower to go buy an adult DVD in your average supermarket, or to wait for some adult shows on tv, after all. Yeah, the early web helped this industry being more accessible. That’s a thing and there is no need to mention how big it has grown with today’s internet. However, in the meantime, there has been a trend of censoring actual graphic images into something more family-friendly and making them “safe for work”.
The concepts of “Safe For Work” and “Not Safe For Work” are typically based on office workers. Because they use a computer at work, they have access to internet. They may tend to let their mind wander and browse through adult websites. If they get caught, chances are they will be fired. What is “safe for work” is any content supposedly viewable at your workplace without the threat of getting you fired. In theory, that is.
Actually, it looks like this:

 

Do what you want coz’ a pirate is free~

 

The first spark of interest came from the goons at Something Awful. September 2002, Emily “Integral” Reigel launched a photograph manipulation contest in the “Comedy Goldmine” section of the site. Displayed over 7 pages, it involved more than 30 modified photos.
Despite being a somewhat great sensation on the site at the time, the meme didn’t catch on before 2006, when some new pictures surfaced on YTMND and in another Something Awul contest. Then, with the rise of websites entirely dedicated to the phenomenon, such as SFW-porn and more importantly PornSFW, it gained momentum.
From then on, more mspaint than photoshop related, many pictures were redesigned in a more cartoony way, with drawings and more flashy colors.

 

No, she is not that girl from mythbusters.

 

If you want to search for yourself, there are tons of websites, forum threads and blogs about the phenomenon. Even 4chan got involved at some point.
Then, 2008 came. People started acknowledging that there was a lot of internet phenomena and that it could be profitable as well.
Diesel, an Italian fashion trademark, seized the opportunity to do their one draw on the meme, in video format.

 

 

There we go. Some company reused a meme on their own and not in a bad way either. Compared to many new memes greedily touched by advertisers and then frowned upon, with the usual outcry from internet watchmen, this one didn’t have that much people trying to protest against it in the end. As far as I’m concerned, I don’t think this meme is “dead” per se, as there is still traffic and interest for it. Nevertheless, it’s quite old and I think it has aged well.
Okay, now, it’s the end of my article. If you will excuse me, I have my daily dose of actual porn to download.

The triviality of internet elitism: Know Your Meme

Let’s talk about Know Your Meme now, shall we? Critics have been made, some raid attempts too. What is the actual goal of the website? To document internet phenomena with a more scientific approach, or at least a pseudoscientific one. It always implies that it bothers a good part of that so-called internet elite which doesn’t like others stepping in “their”territory, even though some KYM members may be part of their anonymous communities without them even noticing.

First of all, I can see why there may be a first point of discordance. KYM wasn’t the first one to do that. Some years earlier, a popular satirical database meant to record drama was launched. It was some kind of Wikipedia-like site open to everyone that wanted to join in. In the beginning, the articles were mostly about LiveJournal and its drama but it quickly expanded to a broader audience when 4chan users strated writing entries. With it, a plethora of new articles about memes, internet and trivial things appeared, mainly surrounding the 4chan’s culture at the time, then a lot more about internet in general. As a matter of act, they promptly accused Know Your Meme of plagiarism, more than being simply inspired by them, slandering the site on a regular basis.

 

Defining and analyzing humor is a pastime of humorless people.

Here is their motto. Okay, it’s always good to have your own opinion on things. No doubt about that, but it’s kinda narrow-minded to think memes are just pieces of humor that can’t be analyzed unless by boring people. Some phenomena are fascinating in the way they come up and spread. It doesn’t mean you lack humor by wanting to analyze how it came to be, how it spread, and why. Why this peculiar image or video? Why not that other one? There is nothing wrong when you became amazed at something, as trivial as it may appear, that you want to thorougly know how it happened. That’s a little like what sociologists or historians do in their own ways. That doesn’t make the subject any less enjoyable, funny, lolrandom or beautiful of you take the time to enjoy it.

But, in the end, we live in an heterogenous world. There always will be cranks questioning every action of everyone. A neutral desire to analyze memes may appear as hiding a dreadful prospect to others, like making money out of it, the same as conspirationists will doubt even the most genuine of facts.
Hey, Captain Obvious, companies already try to make profit off popular trends, memes included. It’s not something new and, more often that we think, they fail.

 

I think the answer is “aliens”.

 

I’m straying a bit off-topic while it is actual at the same time, here, because some arguments from the haters aren’t groundless. Know Your Meme started its way as a sister-project on RocketBoom, a web-show about technology and “geeky” stuff with a grain of salty humor. Working as a collaboration, Know Your meme then grew its own show with its own show, its own YouTube channel. Then, some opinions diverging made most of the old staff quit and the show was brought out in March 2011 by the Cheezburger Network… which isn’t exactly known for being a philantropist company that doesn’t make money off internet phenomena at all…

Anyway, there ARE reasons to doubt KYM’s good will. We mustn’t kid ourselves. Now, with the database, KYM’s agenda is to frontpage articles, funny image and viral videos. They do the same thing with theyr Facebook page. That’s broadly what every sit dealing with internet content, like Cheeburger, reddit or even 9gag, does nowadays. The site’s neutral view is a tad compromised as a result…

From another point of view, Encyclopedia Dramatica which is known to be an über secret clubhouse for true underground net users does the same thing as well by putting favorite articles, videos or images on their front page.

The community, then, would help keeping a seal of quality to the content. They are relatively free to do whatever they want with the database. Again, There are some ups and down however.

How the website works is pretty simple. New articles are put into submission, waiting for a review. The original editor and any people who want to join in can help improve it by adding information, links, pictures, videos or any other medium dealing with the phenomenon at hand. To sum it up, what reviewers expect from an entry are the followings: A small explanation of what the phenomenon is about, a point of origin if able, reports on its spread and prominence on the web and some examples of derivatives.

After the review is done, thing that could take a while, the article is confirmed if the phenomenon has been duly proved as being, or at least having been, notable enough. If nothing has been done to prove it, then the article is put in the Deadpool, some kind of graveyard for badly-written entries, spam, forced memes that haven’t eventually gotten a more “natural” spread, astroturf and so on.

 

Deadpoolception

 

It looks OK on paper. In practice, it looks OK too, generally speaking, if it wasn’t for a key problem: a constant stream of comments signed “Deadpool” every freaking time a user, new but sometime older as well, doesn’t like the article/phenomenon or isn’t convinced by it. Many users think that their strong opinions are taken into account when choosing to confirm or deadpool an entry. They are not. Of course, they can write a comment to help improve the entry but spitting out “+1 Deadpool!” or “+1 Confirm!” won’t influence the review at all. The confirmation process doesn’t work that way,. It doesn’t involve votes and thankfully so because KYM’s will for a neutral view that had already been a bit criticized would have gotten far worse.
Moreover, a feeling of superiority and contempt can transpire from “older researchers”, me included. Researching on the internet teach you some basis in trying to find answers. The fact we want to find “serious” answers to things that may appear as superficial, trivial and that doesn’t need as much attention can make us appear as pedantic, craving for attention. That’s not what we want. At least, I do not. However, this is an attitude we can’t escape from and some people take things way more seriously than they should.
It is an elitism of some sort, kind of similar to the one I ranted about earlier in this article. It’s not always for the greater good.

Anyway, if you want to get “reliable” pieces of information about a meme, Know Your Meme is a good place to go along with Encyclopedia Dramatica in order to corroborate things.

It’s up to you if you are interested by it, after all.

In Memeriam: Figwit

Again, I won’t try to plagiarize the related KYM article. I didn’t wrote that one but I helped with the research and clean-up. Today’s focus is on a peculiar meme that made me discover and love a great band from New-Zealand.

As hardly believable as it may sound, 4chan didn’t influence in any way this meme. It wasn’t born there and, as far as its archives are concerned, it didn’t help it spread either. This one is a mere representation of the blooming web 1.0 from the early 21th century which included photoshopped pictures, art, fan websites, animated gifs and even merchandising.

 

Hello, Bret Mckenzie !

 

Once upon a time, an epic miracle of a movie was released worldwide. It was Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the ring and it happened in December 2001. Soon enough, it became a major hit, even though some hardcore fans were quick to point out discrepancies with the original novel. As you may have noticed, I’m part of the people who loved Peter Jackon’s trilogy, but it is not a place to argue about the movie itself. Plenty of other sites do it better than me. Here, what mattered was a precise scene taking place during Elrond’s Council, around 5:58 in the following video.

 

 

In short, it’s a memorable scene in which each race’s representative gets into an argument about the Ring before they became quiet and amazed at Frodo jumping in and saying his line. The following screenshot shows Gandalf and Boromir in the foreground while some extras are in the background.

 

A legend was born

 

The elven extra on the right, circled in red, would soon catch attention from fans. Iris Hadad, at the time a student in love with Tolkien’s universe, was among the firsts to notice this gorgeous mute elf in the background and thought he should have a name: Figwit. An acronym standing for “Frodo Is Grea… Who Is That?“, it’s supposed to textually represent the reaction the audience would have when watching the scene.

When Frodo says “I will take it!”, we are so impressed we start to think “Frodo is great!” But before we finish, the camera pans and we see Figwit, smoldering enigmatically in the background. All other thoughts are whisked away by that elf – who is THAT?! He’s gorgeous!

In order to share her view and newfound idol, Iris launched a fan website in March 2002.
She quickly found out that she wasn’t the only who noticed the elf. Soon, many fans joined in, creating a community around it and the site began hosting fanfictions, fanmade art, animated gifs and macros.

 

The good ol’ days of the first macros with text in it…

 

If Figwit doesn’t sound as elvish to you, then don’t worry! Other fans found out another nickname for him, Melpomaen, literal Sindarin translation of Fig (Melpo) and Wit (Maen). That new name became quite popular among “slash” fanfiction writers which is to be expected when fangirls get involved with something.
Moreover, fans weren’t the only ones to notice this new myth. Peter Jackson himself got wind of it and hired the extra again, giving him some dialogue as well, in Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, released in December 2003.

 

 

This scene, an ordinary one for most of us Frenchies, was actually pretty big among English-speaking fans. In addition to this, collection cards, figurines and legos were made. There you have another celebrity to add to the list, below Legolas or Gimli.
Anyway, parodies? A phenomenon started on the internet with derivatives and fans, popular enough to influence a producer in hiring the same guy again in his movie? We have most of the elements of an internet memes right here, folks.

One question remains. Who actually is Figwit? If you haven’t guessed it by now, he is Bret Mckenzie, more widely known as the bearded other half of New-Zealand band Flight of the Conchords. If you don’t know the band, check it out, they are awesome. They also do television with a series that began airing on HBO in 2007.
His reaction to the meme was rather humble, even after his numerous interviews about the phenomenon, both in newspapers and on television as well as a whole documentary made in 2004.

Although a small peak of interest for the meme was observed in 2007, when the show first aired, it should be noted that everything mentioned above happened between 2001 and 2004, kinda. Today, if the meme isn’t quite dead, it is rather old in internet age.
But there is peculiar reason I’m writing about it right now because, recently, there has been an unexpected… twist.

 

Sean Bean, I love ya but you’re out of your league here

 

The Hobbit, Lord of the Rins’ prequel, is going to be released as a movie, another trilogy starting next december. If you don’t live in a cave, I’m sure you are already aware of it. What may be surprising, though, is that a news was released when shooting began in 2011: Bret Mckenzie could star again as an elf in the upcoming flick.
The news was picked up on April’s fool day of 2011 so I’m gonna remain cautious about the claim. However, if it indeed turns out to be true, a lot of fans will be staring at every scene trying to find him.
This blog post will be updated when the movie is released, in order to confirm or invalidate the claim.

All men are assholes, or the myth of the innocent young lady

I want to go for a parody here. It doesn’t really have anything to do with memes in general, even though it has a bit of prominence on the web. First of all, this article is meant to echo back to another one written by l’Elfe, in French quite obviously. As a matter of fact and because I can foresee an incoming shitstorm in the comments, I should add that I kinda agree with L’Elfe to some of her points, mainly on the fact that women aren’t token machines in which you shall expect kindess to be rewarded with sex or love, for that matter. It’s always better to simply go and tell your feelings to someone and see what happens than to wait and try to monetize your friendship. However, I don’t fully agree with some of her views on things and whatnot. Anyway, I invite you to go read it if you know a little bit of French.

 

Pertinent, pertinent

 

In her article, she used everyday fruit as a metaphor. I’m gonna reuse it because I like it.
Imagine. There is Grapefruit. Grapefruit has her own desires, her hown feelings. She is cute even though she has some hang-ups with her physical appearance like many others do. She is strong-headed, she knows what she wants and she has plenty of friends, some who are Peaches, some others who are Melons. Anyway, Grapefruit is happy. She found Banana as an ideal boyfriend. Little is known of Banana actually. He is handsome, he knows how to have fun in bed and he is sometime acting romantic.
Yet, everything isn’t as dreamy as it may sound. Banana, on a regular basis, like to be away from Grapefruit when she wants him to be with her. Banana happens to prefer talking to other girls than to stay with her when they go to a party. Grapefruit sometimes waits, feverishly, that Banana answers her messages on his phone. It happens that it takes longer than it should for him to do so. Sometimes, they get in an argument because of this, in which Grapefruit eventually flees and goes take comfort in the friendly arms of some nice Peach guy, crying and swearing about how all Bananas are true assholes.

Grapefruit didn’t understand : Why wasn’t Banana here as often as he should for her? Why did he treat her like that? After all, when he came to her and chatted her up, he knew what to do to convince her he was good to go.
Or maybe… maybe she was simply a piece of meat to him, in the end. Maybe he simply was another manipulative prick. No, she couldn’t believe it. Was she used?

Her suspicions grew stronger when Banana called her and said he wanted to talk. that’s when he stated he needed a break in their relationship. Grapefruit was stunned, more than ever. Ah ! There must be a good reason for that! I’m sure he cheated on me!
Grapefruit knew a lot of possible culprits and she needed to get to the bottom of it. Was it Mango, maybe? Last night, they were pretty close. Or surely it was Orange! Grapefruit found out that they exchanged e-mails on Banana’s computer.

Banana wasn’t going to get away with this! Grapefruit wouldn’t let herself be used again by some monster. She should turn lesbian. Yes, as a female, she knows that her female friend are more trustworthy and are less… terrible.
Or, if that’s not the case, she would end up a spinster, surrounded by thousands of cats, she thinks.

In any case, she has to post a Facebook status about her suffering and to hurl her hatred of every man on the planet. She musts.

 

[Insert Condescending Wonka remark here]

 

At this point in my little tale, I’m going to leave you imagine the rest of the story for yourself. Grapefruit, after she calmed down, still has many ways to carry on in her life: think for herself first, met someone else or keep her hatred deep inside her.
But a relevant question should be asked: Why does Grapefruit resort to complaints against men?
Nothing is known of the true nature of the relationship between Grapefruit and Banana. Nothing is known of Banana himself, as a matter of fact. The same can be said for every other fruit I’ve mentioned here. Banana might be a jerk who actually cheated on Grapefruit many times.
But, what kind of relationship did they have? Were they engaged? Lovers? Friends with benefit? Sexfriends? We can’t tell if we haven’t followed their story in details from beginning to end.

Here, Grapefruit might have been the sole cause of her own suffering, partly if not entirely. Banana may have tried to make her understand that it wasn’t a serious relationship and that’s why he was sometimes away from here. He may not have sought a relationship in which both are always together. He may have clearly warned her at the beginning of their relationship, or hinted to it. Grapefruit may have been too much “oppressive”, in a way, and was way more passionate about something that wasn’t meant to be?
It can’t be known for sure. That’s why generalizing is a real problem. Yes, I know, I’m extrapolating things in this very instant about women, for they like to think we really are ill-mannered sex maniacs. If only it wasn’t so widespread of an idea (I love you Yahoo Answers). *sigh*
Every freaking time, women are shown as victims without, even a single time, trying to think twice about the way they acted or what they did themselves. Alright, it’s the internet, so troll-friendly, but still.

Thanksfully, it’s not THAT general of an assessment. Moreover, some assholes are more likable than others, like him (go read it if you know some basic French! it’s great!).

These days, there is a growing phenomenon challenging the mere notion of what being “in a relationship” means and I think it’s healthy. Thing is, our own education and upbriging by our parents and granparents still remain kinda traditional which means we sometimes can’t seize reality when it strikes us: living together has become less and less a need.
I don’t fully include myself in that statement. I mean, I have my own needs and desires but I still live according to this fact. Love, sexual attraction, tenderness and affection don’t pertain to the same idea anymore. It is now easier to live with someone in an open relationship because you gain “more” freedom. You are not enclosed in a “Relationship” with a capital “R” that you can’t have control over.

When confronted to this, everyone reacts differently. That’s where the matter is. Every reaction should be analyzed separately in each case. General points are an enemy. Not everyone can think back to what they did when somethings goes “wrong” in their love life while some others think too much about it. We are heterogeneous, all of us. We all have our own view on life, we all have our own personal experiences, we all have our own way of dealing with something.

How do we get things into perspective? How do we know if someone likes you even if he acts distant because he wants to live his own life? Tricky, isn’t it?
I don’t have any final answer to this.
In the end, logic dictates that words such as “trust”, “communications” and “be yourself” should be considered.

The triviality of internet elitism: 9gag

Do you know about 9gag? You know, that thing created in 2008 for the sole purpose of sharing unoriginal pictures endlessly? No, not Cheezburger… I mean that popular website everyone seems to love denigrating for its close similarity with reddit, itself said to be a cheeky copy of 4chan, itself inspired by Futaba Channel…? Does it ring any bell?

Yet, if you happen to browse Facebook in your spare time, you should at least have one friend who likes to link back to 9gag, either because he likes the pictures he saw, because he wants to comment on something or because he simply wants to share it. It has become a persistent habit.
A big part of internet’s most underground communities (that’s what they like to call themselves anyway) loves to brag about how 9gag is evil, cancer and tasteless, planning raids against the site for quite some time now. When the Aurora shooting tragedy happened, some tried to link the website to it. Recently, 9gag was again involved in another case after some anonymous (Ha HA) sources revealed some Australian model’s twitter wall full of slandering remarks. Some accused 9gag, others 4chan pretending to be 9gaggers and even others let out some conspiracy theory about 9gag pretending to be 4chan pretending to be 9gag.

 

Self-explanatory

 

Of course, in that case, 9gag is always shown as being a place full of “faggots”, members of a despicable community. It seems so easy to forget that 4chan, mainly its LOLSORANDOM /b/ board, has done far worse in the past.

 

Don’t worry, 4chan has some bright side to it

 

Is this hatred against 9gag sensible and justified? At once I answer you: it is and it is not. 9gag isn’t different from any other site that tries to focus and profit off internets memes, simply because there is a recent crave for it. Reddit and Cheezburger don’t do any better. Of course, that doesn’t mean these two websites are liked for what they are by other communities but they aren’t as hated as 9gag to the point of desiring to have the site taken down because of its popularity. Let’s be clear, I don’t go on 9gag and I don’t like it. I don’t like it because I’ve been accustomed to the same sentiment of scepticism and “I-don’t -like-it” attitude when I see a website reusing content on their own without crediting their sources, even more so when they put watermarks on it and they enable a peculiar repost system. But the same system had already been used by reddit. Don’t even talk about the eBaumsworld era. Aaah, those good ol’ internet fight days.

 

Thank you, Sean

 

The real first problem with 9gag is its view on what is OC (Original Content) and how you have to manage your own creation on internet. It raises copyrights questions for it allows people newly introduced to image-sharing sites to browse through a wide range of content without necessarily crediting the original authors and creators. In short, “They steal content“. It’s the main argument brandished by haters, after, obviously, the whole “they kill/ruin our memes” thing which is not as true as they want you to believe. the 9gag’s community is quick to react violently against the haters too which doesn’t help in understanding the problem, mainly a matter of taste. After all, if we put the valid argument about content theft aside, what draws many to go on a rampage against 9gag is because they witness a more “mainstream” website (called “cancerous” here) abusing of memes ad nauseam. Is it enough of a reason?

 

Yeah, because 9gag is the only freakin’ one doing it

 

As far as I’m concerned, not liking 9gag doesn’t mean I senselessly “hate” it nor I want it down. Actually, like every community, 9gag has its share of good and bad. It’s very easy to use these bad bits as spearheads to launch an holy crusade against it but it clearly hides the actual motives. Those who call out “cancer”, those who speak out vehemently their hatred, are the ones who think they are some kind of net’s intelligentsia because they browse more “underground” websites. They think they are superior to the plebs who only browse Facebook or Youtube on a regular basis. Because they were once involded in some secret things in some lost threads, they feel as they are the watchmen of some kind of internet elite ruling a private clubhouse about what is tasteful or not on the internet. I find this attitude to be quite moronic, don’t you think?
Via Know Your Meme, I wrote an article dealing with this growing feeling of elitism toward a meme or a token community in which one were involved to an certain degree, then they began to feel attached to it and they can become irritated when they acknowledge other people from outside their community growing an interest for what is happening. Anyway, you can make your own mind out of it for what it’s worth.

 

The Favorite Band Selling out effect.

 

Like you like it or not, if 9gag is popular right now despite its reputation, it’s because it’s an easy way of wasting your time browsing through an impressive gallery of pictures and videos. There always is that peculiar image that makes you go “Oh yeah, totally agreed!” and sometimes “Ah! I know someone who will love it. I’m gonna share it!” These Pavlovian reflexes can’t be tone down so easily. It’s the main appeal of file-sharing. Paradoxically, this anti9gag campaign is only giving more attention to the site. I don’t think they were expecting that much, to be honest.

What do you think? What is your take on 9 gag, its community and the hatred that surrounds it?

In Memeriam : LOL

Here, I could simply have copypasted one of my KYM articles about LOL. However, it would be rather redundant, in addition to be a bit dull and silly. I don’t like being redundant even though I happen to stutter, mumble and speak with repetitions by reflex when I try to explain something.

Many people think they have a clear idea of what a meme is. For some, they immediately think about 4chan or reddit and they don’t really know precisely why. Some others picture a cat speaking an unknown language full of grammar mistakes and, finally, some happily talk about 9gag. Actually, and more generally speaking, one may think it usually includes a popular image or video but the true roots are easily forgotten. The very definition of an internet meme is about something funny on the web that goes viral and spreads from a person to another, but it’s not just that. Besides, that piece of medium doesn’t have to be “funny” to begin with. A lot of memes were born before a peculiar imageboard thought to be an hideout for hackers/heartless monsters/wooden fags/masked men (Check/circle all that apply) was created.

 

/b/ IS actually good in its overall free and heterogeneous mediocrity. One should simply live with their time.

 

Here, I won’t be talking about that peculiar online DotA-like game, obviously.

We all have been, one day, in contact with this acronym, L.O.L, or its French equivalent, M.D.R and its own hyperboles if you’re a French speaker. First, it should be noted that LOL can mean a wide variety of things depending on your preference, either Laughing Out Loud, Laugh Out Loud or Lots of Laugh. However, its purpose is always the same: to express your mirth through text, or to be a common answer to pretty much anything.

 

Indeed.

 

This acronym didn’t start Last Thursday. It began appearing on Usenet in the late 80′ (page 10 – Mo_ICONS_PLEASE). Some Calgary dude named Wayne Pearson asserted he created it but can’t prove it.
LOL was part of a new trend of acronyms used to meant something complex while using the least possible amount of characters, like OMG or WTF. The first hiccups of SMS text messaging, if you will. Today, its usage by the youth as well as the elders has become quite common in chatrooms, online games and other services, even more after it opened itself to the world with numerous translations and own reuses by many countries. Don’t forget about the written and spoken mutations of the acronym as years passed. Now, from LOL, there are LULZ (thanks to you Anonymous) LEL and LOLZ, and don’t get me started on its new verb form. It has become so widespread in this growing internet culture trend that a lot of newer memes have their names derived from it.

Do you know about LOLcats ? Maybe LOLguy ? Or rather the LOL, Internet fad ?

Yes, I’m trying to make you think about something symbolic here : timelessness. This meme has lived through nearly every generation of net users, unlike some other phenomena that didn’t last more than a week. I can’t say for sure if LOL will still be there in the next century but it seems more likely than ever!

 

Pretty much accurate.

 

LOL, ROFL, LULZ, MDR, EXPDR, same boat. It’s quite difficult not to look down on someone who used one of these acronyms out of the blue in a conversation, even more if he did it out loud, transgressing the imaginary “Everything that is on the internet stays on the internet” rule. It’s difficult not to acknowledge it as nuisance when it is heavily spammed. It’s also quite difficult to believe that, by typing “LOL”, you meant you’re laughing so loud that you may be dying trying to catch your breath, shaking violently as you drool, your mouth wide open. Its use has become commonplace which means its primary meaning has as well. LOL now serves as an easy answer for pretty much anything. Does it mean it represents something harmful? In the end, no, it doesn’t. It’s simply part of its evolution through its exposure to people.

 

 

LOL is a meme. It is an idea that has spread from a person to another to the point it has become part of today’s writing, adding new neologisms to the English language and some others. It settled what is called “Internet Slang”, going though a bucketload of modifications and mutations thoughout the world to be what it is  today, a widely-known piece of slang.